News IP

‘The Picture of Dorian Gray’: what’s that got to do with minorities and Goebbels?

I started reading Oscar Wilde right after Hemingway. That's what I think anyway. And even in a printed format—this is when the book is printed in a printing house. In this case, the fact—a printed book—is twice as important: the book is special, from my grandfather's library (his name, by the way, was Ivan too). The preface is somewhat less remarkable, of course, than the actual work, but it’s worth mentioning about.
The book was published a long time ago, in the sixties. Accordingly, the segue, as they say, is contextual. Mr. Wilde, though a representative of the 19th century bourgeoisie, is a man who is fully aware of its barren worthlessness, deep injustice (as a result of a divided society and the time in general) and, ultimately, its doom. This is what I remember as the essence and the main idea of the preface message. Well, what else could have been said in the middle of the last century... And on the other hand, it might have been the way he, Oscar Wilde, perceived his surroundings—understood the imperfection of the system, social arrangement, saw the real and the true nature of the high society, being in a way party to it. Though not an aristocrat, but yet… There was a lot of stuff in the introduction, rather boring, as it seemed to me, and closer to 3/4 of the preface, I made the decision (management, no less) to quit and not suffer further. The book is printed in such a small font, as I remember now, with serifs; the paper is somewhat withered, faded... in a word, one can read it only in the right position and with proper (that is, generous and bright) lighting. After some more considerations, I arrived at another conclusion which naturally suggested itself—to read the book without suffering, that is, on the phone. I confess that I did not resist in that case either.
In any case, it was interesting to look at the work of the eminent writer through the prism of Soviet reviewers.

I read a short story by Oscar Wilde as an initial introduction to the author’s creative work. Something about a young man and a rose... I don't remember the details anymore. The language did not seem to me stunning and somehow brilliant. I will immediately refer to... Dickens of course. Who else could have been praised to the skies. A genius! He’s an absolute genius! Well, this is just... just a little emotional digression. Actually, down to the point.

Did you know that Oscar Wilde was a homosexual? I don't remember how I’ve found out about this (tragic) fact. But this fact formed the basis of my perception of his most famous work as to my mind—‘The Portrait of Dorian Gray’. The way he describes the young man, the main character of the story, his impeccable beauty, manners, social contacts—this to a certain extent may be a reflection of the hidden and suppressed personal experiences of the author. It is possible that this is how Oscar Wilde imagined his ideal partner / friend or whatever..., such could be his fantasies about a young and initially inexperienced young man, pure and immaculate, like everything not yet ‘corroded’ under the influence of social relations. But it is precisely this metamorphosis, the drama of life which is revealed on the pages of the novel. Every day a young man, finding himself in a public mill and unable to cope with its pernicious destructive force, every day, with his every deed or action, he finds his reflection—his portrait—merging more and more with a side of the society which we hide carefully. It is just like Dorian hiding his portrait in a closed dark and dusty room at the top, where no one would see anything, we hide all our unseemly (or not?) secrets that we sometimes are ashamed of.

Summing up? What's all this about?
I think that society is as strong as its weakest representative is protected. Are the so-called sexual minorities a weak part of society? I think the answer obviously depends on the details—where and what. Are children a weak part of society that requires protection? Here, as it seems to me, there are many controversies. As, indeed, in many other manifestations of our human activity. Things are complicated. One needs to look for a balance in every sphere. It is impossible to deny the unconditional facts, just as it is unnecessary to leave the regulation of complex moral and ethical or interpersonal relations solely to the mercy of public institutions. But sometimes priorities need to be set up exactly defining the requirements that everyone should follow.

What about all these hints and undertones, bro?
I don't like the way we treat the LGBT community, representatives of minorities. In my opinion, it is impossible to drive people into a situation when someone is forced to hide what he or she is, to hide what is important to them, the kind of relationships people choose, these same members of our society; I don't like it when people are afraid to speak out and just afraid to be what they are. I don't like it when children with immature outline of life concepts, including morality, and just simple physiological issues of gender relations, are stuffed with pseudo-liberal values that have no reasonable boundaries, blurring the transitions between them to the point of absurdity. We need a balance.

Until about 30 years ago, for example, sexism was through the roof in English-language TV series, judging from the point of view of our current norms and concepts. I would like to think that time flies and we loose its track... and peace will reign in the Galaxy! (a quote from ‘Star Wars’, the scene of emergency powers given by the Parliament of the Republic to Palpatine).
I would like to give some quotes that have caught my attention. And the book, of course, does not imply the need for any reviews!
(Though not Dickens all the same…)

Actual life was chaos, but there was something terribly logical in the imagination. It was the imagination that set remorse to dog the feet of sin.
It was the imagination that made each crime bear its misshapen brood. In the common world of fact the wicked were not punished, nor the good rewarded. Success was given to the strong, failure thrust upon the weak. That was all.
IP: Such a profound thought had to be searched for, as they say.

One should absorb the colour of life, but one should never remember its details. Details are always vulgar.
It is the confession, not the priest, that gives us absolution.
IP: The book is full of vivid statements and subtle (philosophical, aren’t they?) remarks.

You know I am not a champion of marriage. The real drawback to marriage is that it makes one unselfish. And unselfish people are colourless. They lack individuality. Still, there are certain temperaments that marriage makes more complex.
Thin-lipped wisdom spoke at her from the worn chair, hinted at prudence, quoted from that book of cowardice whose author apes the name of common sense.
IP: The scene describing conversation of Dorian’s bride with her mother. Where lies the border that separates prudence from cowardice…

The only artists I have ever known, who are personally delightful, are bad artists.
Good artists exist simply in what they make, and consequently are perfectly uninteresting in what they are. A great poet, a really great poet, is the most unpoetical of all creatures.
But inferior poets are absolutely fascinating. The worse their rhymes are, the more picturesque they look. The mere fact of having published a book of second-rate sonnets makes a man quite irresistible.
IP: The idea is, as it seems to me, and I would not disagree with the author, that this mutually exclusive rule applies not only to artists, whichever, but also extends to much more prosaic areas of life.

Women are a decorative sex. They never have anything to say, but they say it charmingly. Women represent the triumph of matter over mind, just as men represent the triumph of mind over morals.
‘Harry, how can you?’
‘My dear Dorian, it is quite true. I am analysing women at the present, so I ought to know. The subject is not so abstruse as I thought it was. I find that, ultimately, there are only two kinds of women, the plain and the coloured. The plain women are very useful. If you want to gain a reputation for respectability, you have merely to take them down to supper. The other women are very charming. They commit one mistake, however. They paint in order to try and look young. Our grandmothers painted in order to try and talk brilliantly. Rouge and esprit used to go together.’
She was a curious woman, whose dresses always looked as if they had been designed in a rage and put on in a tempest.
Live! Live the wonderful life that is in you! Let nothing be lost upon you. Be always searching for new sensations. Be afraid of nothing….A new Hedonism—that is what our century wants. You might be its visible symbol.
IP: Reads like an anthem of modern youth…

The aim of life is self-development. To realise one's nature perfectly—that is what each of us is here for. People are afraid of themselves, nowadays. They have forgotten the highest of all duties, the duty that one owes to one's self. Of course they are charitable. They feed the hungry, and clothe the beggar. But their own souls starve, and are naked. Courage has gone out of our race. Perhaps we never really had it. The terror of society, which is the basis of morals, the terror of God, which is the secret of religion—these are the two things that govern us.
Intellect is in itself a mode of exaggeration, and destroys the harmony of any face. The moment one sits down to think, one becomes all nose, or all forehead, or something horrid. Look at the successful men in any of the learned professions. How perfectly hideous they are!
It is better not to be different from one's fellows. The ugly and the stupid have the best of it in this world.

Good luck to everyone and enjoy your reading!

PS I also read Lem's ‘Solaris’ and some essay ‘Goebbels. Propaganda. Paul Joseph Goebbels. Biography, photo, personal life’ by a certain Maksim Clim. In the latter case, I should note I was misled. I thought that there would be a biography presented, but I got (for my money) only a short essay / abstract on the topic. But two quotes, nevertheless, I want to give.

A large scale Berlin Olympics of 1936, organized by Goebbels with great generosity, became a demonstration of the strength of the German spirit, became a model of the success of this propaganda.
‘A lie told a hundred times becomes the truth,’ Goebbels deduced such a formula, broadcasting lies and launching disinformation to the masses on purpose and in huge quantities. The denigration of political opponents of the NSDAP, if there were any left in the Third Reich, and the popularization of anti-Semitism were in the focus.

IP: If we shout from the house tops that gays are the same pedophiles, people could also get overwhelmed and believe it. After all, that's what happened. I will no longer dwell on the topic of all sorts of other guises and manifestations of all the propaganda limitless potential and power. I wanted to read Goebbels' book, but as I understand, it is not in free access.
I liked Lem very much. I'll tell you this straight away. I will suggest a few points-considerations and a couple of quotes.

  • Unusual and bright. But this is not fiction, it’s rather some kind of a psychological thriller.
  • I wanted something just fantastic. So that the read would not load me down, but rather… envelop.
  • The theory of God is extremely laconic and interesting, but unfortunately, to my mind, it is not developed and not disclosed on the pages of the book.
  • Somewhere closer to the beginning of the book, but not at the very beginning, a boring section with detailed descriptions of the vital activity of the living Solaris ocean-planet, written by a certain Geze—a research scientist is presented. I honestly confess, I caught and understood the minimum of the suggested by the author. The same—bores—are repeated in the 3/4 part of the text.
I was lying on my back, without a thought, her head on my shoulder. The darkness filling the room was becoming populated. I could hear steps. The walls were disappearing. Something was towering over me, bigger and bigger, endless. I was penetrated through and through, embraced without being touched; I froze still in the darkness, feeling its acute transparency that was displacing the air. I could hear a heart very far away. I focused my whole attention, all the strength I had left, on expecting death throes. They didn’t come. I just kept shrinking, while the unseen sky, the unseen horizons, the emptiness, devoid of shapes, clouds, stars, drawing back and swelling, was making me its center.
I had switched the loudspeaker off right after takeoff, and I lacked the courage to turn it back on. I would have done virtually anything not to have to hear again that terrible voice, which carried no vestige of anything human. This much I could say — all appearances had been smashed, and from under the appearance of Harey’s face another, truer face had begun to show, compared to which the alternative of madness was truly becoming a liberation.

(Translated by Bill Johnston

Premier Digital Publishing)

This book by Lem does load one down! Be ready.
2023-03-11 15:13